![]() ![]() So thoughtful and well-designed that it wouldn’t have in any way been undermined by having more merely curious or somehow low powered people around. ![]() ![]() It all seemed really thoughtful and well-designed. To CEA’s enormous credit they have a really good system in place of one-on-one meetings, formal office hours, and informal hangouts and there was plenty of stuff happening both formally and informally on the fringes of the event. But I don’t know that I really understand why the event would have been worse if it had featured more people from both of those categories. I know of two main categories of people who seem to have applied and gotten rejected - people very personally invested in EA as a cause but deemed unworthy of networking opportunities, and semi-important DC types who are maybe EA-curious but were deemed insufficiently committed to EA. After going through my first EAG this past weekend, I am left pretty confused about the rationale for the competitive application process. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |